Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Strange\s+Idea\s+for\s+an\s+Input\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Strange\s+Idea\s+for\s+an\s+Input\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Strange Idea for an Input (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 16:30:47 -0600; Hey guys.... What about using a tuner between the rig and the amp for those amps which do not have a tuned input. My cheap little MFJ Versa Tuner will load a noodle it seems. Why couldn't you use it; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00288.html (7,303 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Strange Idea for an Input (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 18:53:04 -0500; First I'd like to say I'm sorry about all the non-technical traffic. I'm fully comfortable with technical disagreements, because everyone learns more when issues are discussed. No one learns anything; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00295.html (8,542 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Strange Idea for an Input (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Sat, 29 Mar 97 11:10:37 -0800; True enough. However, when one faction in a technical disagreement turns to cheap shots, everyone (else) learns that their technical shots were probably duds (a.k.a. technoblather). Hopefully the pr; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00306.html (7,456 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]