Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+The\s+Worldwide\,\s+No\s+Holds\s+Barred\,\s+SWR\s+Quiz\.\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 22:26:42 -0700
Questions 1 and 2: A 50-ohm termination is connected to a generator through a one-half wavelength, 93 ohm characteristic-Z coaxial cable. What is the SWR as measured at the generator with a 50-ohm ch
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00049.html (8,291 bytes)

2. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: jones@cunliffegroup.com (Jamie Jones)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 13:36:29 -0400
Its 1:1 or as close as your VSWR brige is accurate and has a adequate directivity so it does NOT gets messed up by the eventual existing different Z of your source. It is close to 2:1 same restiction
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00050.html (9,559 bytes)

3. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W)
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 1999 14:54:29 EDT
If I was in a picky mood, I'd inquire as to the characteristic impedance of the generator. :-) 73, Marv WC6W * ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet jus
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00051.html (9,216 bytes)

4. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 03:04:42 -0700
? zero-ohms, Marv It's a voltage-source. cheers. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrativ
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00055.html (9,391 bytes)

5. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal)
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 1999 16:33:44 -0700
Undetermined, depending on the meter's construction and circuitry. This is not an appropriate instrument for this test. 1.86 to 1 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/amp
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00056.html (8,954 bytes)

6. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 11:22:08 -0400
Since I'm wearing egg anyway, more can't hurt. 1. Smith Chart says 1/2 wave cable brings you all the around back to the original load impedance (50 ohms, here). Therefore the black box of the cable/l
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00104.html (9,616 bytes)

7. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 22:53:18 -0700
? You have 50 +/- j0 ohms at the position of the SWR meter, and it reads 1.86:1? I don't see how, Mike. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/amps
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00113.html (10,676 bytes)

8. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 14:18:29 -0400
On Tuesday, October 05, 1999 1:53 AM, measures [SMTP:measures@vcnet.com] wrote: of the reads Rich, this says that as long as I have a multiple-half-wave of cable, the impedance of the cable plays no
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00119.html (9,822 bytes)

9. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal)
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 12:36:05 -0700
Because an SWR meter computes SWR by comparing forward and reflected power, not by being an impedance bridge! 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submission
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00124.html (9,088 bytes)

10. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 01:09:15 -0700
ok It eliminates reflections only at the halfwave point. Cheers, Mike - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contest
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00126.html (10,375 bytes)

11. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 16:20:33 -0400
On Tuesday, October 05, 1999 4:09 AM, measures [SMTP:measures@vcnet.com] wrote: [SMTP:measures@vcnet.com] to box of the end. reads created It doesn't eliminate the standing waves along the cable. The
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00133.html (10,839 bytes)

12. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 99 15:22:54 -0500
But Vic, Source impedance is 50 Ohms. Load impedance is 50 Ohms. The transmission line is a length where even you agree that the transformed impedance at the end of it is 50 Ohms. So where is the imp
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00135.html (9,632 bytes)

13. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 16:47:17 -0400
On Monday, October 04, 1999 4:23 PM, Jon Ogden [SMTP:jono@enteract.com] wrote: reads transmission line is a length where even you agree that the transformed impedance at the end of it is 50 Ohms. So
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00139.html (10,319 bytes)

14. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 99 16:07:37 -0500
IF THE SOURCE WAS 93 OHMS, YES! But you are dealing with a 50 OHM source! -- -- -- -- You have to think of the entire system. The 93 Ohm line acts as an impedance transformer. The impedance at the in
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00140.html (11,568 bytes)

15. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 02:41:19 -0700
? the Z presented at the point where the meter is inserted is 50 +/- j0 ohms. How could there be a reflection at this point? - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://ww
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00145.html (8,884 bytes)

16. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 03:37:56 -0700
? True. . However, the meter is not moving along the cable. It is fixed at the generator end of the halfwave transmission line. ? Reflections exist only within the 93 ohm, half wavelength section. -
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00151.html (10,375 bytes)

17. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 03:37:59 -0700
? interesting question, Jon. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQ
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00153.html (8,813 bytes)

18. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: realex@flash.net (bob alexander)
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 19:35:08 -0500
///snip/// -- Hi Rich, I think the main problem here is a lack of understanding as to what a standing wave is. It is simply a voltage or current on a line that changes amplitude as you move from one
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00166.html (11,347 bytes)

19. [AMPS] The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1)
Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 01:26:36 -0700
OK ? indeed. So when the 50-ohm SWR meter is moved from either end of the halfwave section to the 1/4 wavelength / midpoint, the SWR increases from 1:1 to 1.86:1. . This is why SWR measurement is an
/archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00182.html (11,186 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu