Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Toll\s+Free\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Toll Free (score: 1)
Author: n3hrt@us.hsanet.net (Martin Gary)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:02:20 -0400
On the subject of Toll Free.... I never post on this reflector because of all of the blatant a$$holes that hang out here. I delete 80% of the messages that come from here. However, once in a while I
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00343.html (8,278 bytes)

2. [AMPS] Toll Free (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 07:54:00 -0700
zzzzzzzz - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00344.html (7,472 bytes)

3. [AMPS] Toll Free (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 17:42:11 EDT
has Yes, this is the prevailing attitude today: I don't care what anybody else thinks, but boy, they had better worry about what I think. Apparently Martin doesn't read this list very often if he thi
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00359.html (8,486 bytes)

4. [AMPS] Toll Free (score: 1)
Author: watson@epiloglaser.com (George K. Watson)
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 16:06:36 -0600
One of the odd things about this whole discussion is that while several licensed amateurs contributing to this reflector have alluded to running illegal power, these folks do not receive criticism fo
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00361.html (7,835 bytes)

5. [AMPS] Toll Free (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 19:19:41 -0400
I'm more concerned about what appears to be a lack of good technical information from Mr. Unknown. I'm waiting to see his "technical contributions". That will sort the wheat from the chaff. Why not
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00366.html (8,371 bytes)

6. [AMPS] Toll Free (score: 1)
Author: watson@epiloglaser.com (George K. Watson)
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 17:41:41 -0600
Yes, we should get back to our regularly scheduled bickering about, oh god... I can't even type the word.... ppppaaaarraaassssiiittiicccsss. Hope I haven't let loose the dogs of war. BTW Mr. Rauch y
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00368.html (7,753 bytes)

7. [AMPS] Toll Free (score: 1)
Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 19:04:34 -0500
Just like a lot of admirable 'wild' animals- when he bites back he is considered 'bad'. I have seen him bite, and , in each case I can remember, it was in reply to some real, honest, 'holier-than-tho
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00370.html (8,556 bytes)

8. [AMPS] Toll Free (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 22:15:45 -0400
It's hard to say, without seeing the layout and components, where the loss is. Certainly most of the loss, if the system uses the correct components, should be in the diodes. I wouldn't use a series
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00376.html (8,062 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu