- 1. [AMPS] Transceivers high 3rd order IMD (score: 1)
- Author: irosky@yahoo.com (igor rosky)
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 06:02:53 -0800 (PST)
- Thanks to all who replied. What is the standards for military communications SSB transmitters. I have heard the US coast guard fire up on 13mhz with 10kw and the signal was huge, but just so clean an
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00498.html (7,706 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] Transceivers high 3rd order IMD (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:27:40 -0000
- The nearest professional standard equivalent to the amateur service is the maritime service. Here the standard is -31dB rel PEP, -25dB rel tone.(There's an ETSI Standard, I think it's ETS 300-377) Fo
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00500.html (8,495 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Transceivers high 3rd order IMD (score: 1)
- Author: n3hrt@us.hsanet.net (Martin Gary)
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:19:26 -0500
- I used to work on HF transmitters for the Navy. Military transmitters have to meet the following standards: You test the transmitter by injecting two tones on ssb - 1000 and 1625 Hz. 3rd order IMD -
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00502.html (8,551 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] Transceivers high 3rd order IMD (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 13:56:43 -0500
- The AB1 spec at 2KV is 335ma per tube. In AB2 at 2.5KV it is 400ma. Must have had to in order to keep the The stock AB2 NCL-2000 ran -28dB. With the G3SEK screen regulator and biased closer to AB1 t
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00537.html (9,288 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu