Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+amplifier\s+\"audio\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+amplifier\s+\"audio\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] amplifier "audio" (score: 1): Author: mays@indigo.ucdavis.edu (Skip); Date: Mon, 9 Jun 1997 17:14:34 -0700 (PDT); I really don't want this to turn into a big thread that I don't have time to answer each question, but.... Yes, RF amplifiers can and do modify the audio responce of a signal, both "good and bad". A; /archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00145.html (8,466 bytes)
2. [AMPS] amplifier "audio" (score: 1): Author: W8IK@IBM.NET (Joe Subich, W8IK); Date: Mon, 09 Jun 1997 21:36:20 -0400; Modification of audio response by AM transmitters has absolutely no bearing to amateur radio. In the case of AM radio, the desired audio bandwidth is +/- 10 KHz at (approximately) 1 MHz. In an AM bro; /archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00146.html (8,566 bytes)
3. [AMPS] amplifier "audio" (score: 1): Author: crb@nanoteq.com (Chris R. Burger); Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 09:06:27 +200; Sure, if you're not using a linear (or approximately linear) amp. Two points: 1. Broadcast AM can use non-linear amps. 2. Broadcast amps require matching over their entire audio bandwidth, which is a; /archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00149.html (7,916 bytes)
4. [AMPS] amplifier "audio" (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 10:55:54 +0000; The problem with AM BCB comparison is one of bandwidth as a percentage of frequency and accumulated Q in the system. A 20 KHz wide (with 10 KHz upper modulation frequency) or wider signal is a large; /archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00152.html (8,425 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]