Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+choice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+choice\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: sheepdip@continet.com (Larry L. Ravlin); Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 17:51:47 -0700; Henry 3X Classic W/ 3-500Z's and a Ameritron AL-82, same tubes. Which would you choose?????? Larry -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00018.html (7,459 bytes)
2. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 20:08:24 -0700; Larry, This is a no brainer! Look at the parts and construction of a HENRY vs the other amp. The 3K-A (pair 3-500Z) is arguably the strongest amp ever built using those tubes. Easy 2KW+ without taxin; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00020.html (9,198 bytes)
3. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com); Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 12:07:36 -0400; Neither if prior comments from others are considered. Until some company actually builds a completely stable glass tube amp I will stick to my TL-922. About 20 years and never a problem. Larry ______; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00034.html (8,806 bytes)
4. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 10:10:03 -0700; I have no idea what "Until some company The Henry amplifiers using 3-500 tubes are quite mature and stable, to say the least. This is nothing new either. It is widely known that the Kenwood TL922 had; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00036.html (10,955 bytes)
5. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 11:49:04 -0700; ? To the best of my knowledge, the World Record for grid-fil. shorting brand-new 3-500Zs in under one day is currently shared by two 3K-A Henry Radio amplifiers. Both amplifiers reportedly shorted f; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00041.html (8,859 bytes)
6. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 11:49:06 -0700; ? I too own a 922. . Ever measured the resistance of the vhf suppressor resistors, Larry? - cheers Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contes; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00042.html (8,663 bytes)
7. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 16:34:38 -0700; I didn't know you were the "Guinness book" keeper of these things in amplifiers. Good to know........ My guess is that the amplifier lived through this disaster. Defective tubes caused this problem,; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00055.html (10,912 bytes)
8. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 00:55:40 -0700; ? Four defective 3-500Z tubes with grid-fil. shorts from Eimac seems doubtful. If the tubes came with grid/fil shorts, where did the big-bang and fireworks come from? - - Always blame the other guy.; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00063.html (9,271 bytes)
9. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 10:13:22 +0100; I was told (for what it's worth) that the TL922 couldn't meet the safety requirements of the European Low Voltage Directive, and it wasn't worth manufacturing such an old design for the more limited; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00067.html (8,570 bytes)
10. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 07:58:10 -0700; ? With 216v input, the filament voltage in a stock TL922 is nearly ideal. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Subm; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00074.html (8,268 bytes)
11. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 16:06:47 +0100; ? With 216v input, the filament voltage in a stock TL922 is nearly ideal Might well be: I understood the problem was that if you were wearing a metal bracelet or necklace and leant over the thing in; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00075.html (8,455 bytes)
12. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 11:24:28 -0400; Nope, it aint broke so why bother, they look just like new and there is no sign of arcing. I did use Carls suggestion of changing out the VHF choke to a glitch resistor and adding a resistor to the f; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00077.html (9,617 bytes)
13. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:50:36 -0700; Larry ? It's kinda like checking the oil pan in a car engine for metal shavings. ? parasites are so fast they almost never damage the appearance of the suppressor resistors. ? sounds good. 48 amps of; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00079.html (8,923 bytes)
14. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 5 May 99 12:06:55 -0500; They also have 20 million legs and hide in electronic components just waiting for when you least expect them. Then they jump out and cause havoc. Kinda like gremlins except smaller. They are almost; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00080.html (8,390 bytes)
15. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 14:17:46 -0700; Even MORE doubtful is TWO separate amplifiers would make tubes blow up in the same day. Blame where blame is due. 73, Dan W7RF -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00082.html (8,859 bytes)
16. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 00:58:03 -0700; ? ... your version, not mine. . The two events reportedly took place years apart in two 3K-A amplifiers. The tubes did not "blow up". They shorted the same day they were placed in service. The tubes; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00089.html (8,824 bytes)
17. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 10:28:49 +0100; over >again? What's Linville done that you always want to ignore him? Do you have to be so Stern? 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00092.html (7,785 bytes)
18. [AMPS] choice (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 6 May 99 09:09:40 -0500; OK, I'll look at ALL the stability factors if it will make you happy! See you in about a week at Dayton! 73, Jon KE9NA -- The Second Amendment is NOT about duck hunting! Jon Ogden jono@enteract.com; /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00093.html (7,916 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]