Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+linearity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+linearity\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] linearity (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 09:25:17 -0000; One of the most delicate tests for dynamic linearity is the use of two identical diode detectors on the input and output of the amplifier. They need feeding from something like a directional coupler; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00315.html (8,747 bytes)
2. [AMPS] linearity (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 97 04:44:13 -0800; ... ... ... If the screen potential was being varied at an RF rate, maybe something of the sort would be possible. However, in the G2DAF circuit, the screen potential is varied at a semi-audio rate w; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00317.html (8,495 bytes)
3. [AMPS] linearity (score: 1): Author: lars.harlin@pocab.se (Lars Harlin); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 15:38:26 +0100; * I doubt that, as G2DAF is designed for zero-bias operation. That means that * the amp will draw some amount of gridcurrent at all levels of drive. * Taking this facts into account, I really don`t u; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00318.html (9,300 bytes)
4. [AMPS] linearity (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 97 09:34:34 -0800; True. With no grid bias supply, grid current is assured. The two G2DAF-users temporarily lowered the drive in order to decrease the grid current -- which decreased the splatter level. In a grid driv; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00319.html (10,616 bytes)
5. [AMPS] linearity (score: 1): Author: lars.harlin@pocab.se (Lars Harlin); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:51:13 +0100; SM3BDZ: AG6K: Since when did you take TRX vox into account when measuring efficiency of an RF-amplifier? Could it be an EIMAC recommendation...? ;) IMO The point with higher efficiency is not to get; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00320.html (8,369 bytes)
6. [AMPS] linearity (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 97 21:52:25 -0800; It was not Rich who associated the subject of zero resting current with efficiency. You claimed that the resting current in a G2DAF amplifier is lower than that in a Class AB1 amplifier. I pointed o; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00324.html (8,649 bytes)
7. [AMPS] linearity (score: 1): Author: lars.harlin@pocab.se (Lars Harlin); Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 07:10:56 +0100; Besides efficiency this is true, but with G2DAF its a freebee.... /Lars -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@con; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00326.html (8,970 bytes)
8. [AMPS] linearity (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 97 04:58:52 -0800; ... ... ... Grandfather Measures used to say: "There is no such thing as a free lunch." cheers, Lars Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html S; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00331.html (7,516 bytes)
9. [AMPS] linearity (score: 1): Author: lars.harlin@pocab.se (Lars Harlin); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 14:12:57 +0100; Grandfather Harlin used to say: " If you arguments are weak - raise your voice!" Merry x-mas Rich! /Lars -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administ; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00334.html (7,783 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]