Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+s\s+meter\s+calibration\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+s\s+meter\s+calibration\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. [AMPS] s meter calibration (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@nis4u.com (Larry Molitor); Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:07:30 +0100; I don't know anybody at NIST. Not sure I want to. (or need to) This has been a headache for me for years at my day job. Don't want to get carried away with it at home. Or, at least didn't want to. No; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00200.html (10,347 bytes)
22. [AMPS] s meter calibration (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@blomand.net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:49:06 -0700; Peter, Larry as well as Tom, Dick & Harry: Does it really make any difference about S meter calibration. As I understand it, if the other station gives out 599's or 5 x 5's and finds it necessary for; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00204.html (10,098 bytes)
23. [AMPS] s meter calibration (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 08:49:21 +0100; That's one advantage of building model steam locomotives - in the final analysis, you make things fit, rather than measure them super accurately! 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.c; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00207.html (8,141 bytes)
24. [AMPS] s meter calibration (score: 1): Author: N6BUU@aol.com (N6BUU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:30:06 EDT; << I vote for better receivers with "NO" S meters. 73 Bob K4TAX >> NO,NO...they will fill the space with more bottons! i say keep the "s" meter, but have it always read 40 over! hank -- FAQ on WWW: h; /archives//html/Amps/2000-06/msg00213.html (7,853 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]