Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+$fwd$\s+Re\:\s+Heathkit\s+Copyright\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+$fwd$\s+Re\:\s+Heathkit\s+Copyright\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] (fwd) Re: Heathkit Copyright (score: 1): Author: ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk; Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 18:35:57 -0400; He fell asleep at the wheel and drifted over into the trademarks lane :-) I suggest regulating the screen voltage tightly to reduce third order IMD. Tony _____________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00208.html (6,696 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] (fwd) Re: Heathkit Copyright (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 19:19:53 -0400; "DeepFreeze" LOST their copyright to their name as it was in such common use that it was considered "generic". That has always puzzled me that DOS was copyrighted as it is by itself a generic term. 7; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00209.html (7,823 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] (fwd) Re: Heathkit Copyright (score: 1): Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 18:22:21 -0700 (PDT); You are confusing "copyright" with "trademark". There is a big difference! When a company does not vigorously defend a "trademark" and the term starts becoming a generic term for a product then the; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00211.html (11,526 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]