Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+shipping\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+shipping\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - shipping (score: 1): Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:34:03 -0800; I had to add my 2 cents on this, my mom used to work at the main post office down town St. Louis. She always said not to over make a package as "fragile glass" because as they sort them they would ma; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00757.html (7,344 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - shipping (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:11:24 -0800; The safest package marking for delicate items is: FECAL SAMPLES FOR COLO-RECTAL CANCER TESTING Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ A; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00795.html (8,105 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - shipping (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:27:51 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time); LMAO! Well, that would get their attention. I have to admit, I did send a fresh cow pile throught the mail one time to a guy for a practical joke. Had it wrapped in a plastic bag though so it wouldn'; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00802.html (9,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]