Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[Heathkit\]\s+The\s+SB\-220\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[Heathkit\]\s+The\s+SB\-220\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: "k5jv" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:13:18 -0500; Greetings to all, I usually do not comment on topics like this but could not resist this time. I, also, have been repairing amps for about 40 years -- have probably worked on 100 SB-220's. I think it; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00386.html (8,462 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:23:43 -0700; Any material be it nichrome,stainless steel,or any other poor conductive metal will de-tune the anodes and resist the tendency for parasitic occillation.It also lowers efficiency on the higher freque; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00387.html (11,011 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:27:45 EDT; Did I miss a post here where someone was poking at Mr Measures? QRZ??? Jim..K7RDX.. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00390.html (7,248 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: chas <chasm@texas.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:01:00 -0500; I want to add an "Attaboy LON!" here because I personally own one of his SB220 mod jobs and it is a pure pleasure to operate. I just wish that I could use the SSB side of the switch but without repla; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00395.html (8,902 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:20:09 -0700; I am confused here, so what are you trying to say, attaboy for selling me the amp, but it does not work properly like it should, so I need to take it back and have it fixed to work like it is suppose; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00398.html (9,394 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:59:34 +0800; My experiences are similar to your's. In every amplifier that I have installed Nichrome, whether commercially made or home brew, the change has been very noticeable. I don't care who invented the ide; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00399.html (11,669 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:09:39 +0000; I must lead a charmed life ... in 54 years of Hamming and three SB-220's along the way, I have never had such catastrophic failures as I have seen described. In fact, several of my friends who also h; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00400.html (13,338 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: chas <chasm@texas.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:22:51 -0500; sorry, I am really bad in writing... I expect people to read my mind I guess <G> no, just wanted to say kudos to Lon for doing a superb job of modifying and upgrading my specimen. It might now work l; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00401.html (9,349 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:29:01 -0700; Chas, I think I knew what you meant, but it did need a bit of clarifying hi hi. I am glad you enjoy the amp. 73, Mike --Original Message-- Mike wrote: it sorry, I am really bad in writing... I expect; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00402.html (9,610 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:12:40 EDT; already installed the AG6K suppressors in my 6 Meter Conversion _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00405.html (7,536 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:24:08 -0400; Amen to that. The huge majority of amps that I buy for 6M conversion are 100% untouched by voodo science and have no signs of problems ever. OTOH, a few with directly grounded grids Ive bought real c; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00408.html (16,479 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:41:46 +0000; Do you have a copy of that Heath Service Bulletin ? Or know if it is on-line ? 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.conte; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00411.html (17,933 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] [HeathKit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: "kingwood" <k5jv@kingwoodcable.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:08:29 -0500; Dick, I would like to have a copy of this service bulletin also. The only one I have heard of dealt with fusing the, otherwise unprotected, filament transformer primary. Of course, this change should; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00413.html (10,200 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] [Heathkit] The SB-220 (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:09:12 -0400; Do you have Google available? I do have the hard copy. Carl KM1H Do you have a copy of that Heath Service Bulletin ? Or know if it is on-line ? 73, Dick, W1KSZ by tube, the modifications designed, __; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00414.html (17,737 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]