Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+220VOLT\s+LINE\.\.\.Redux\s+and\s+\?\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Melland, W9WIS" <w9wis@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:29:39 -0800
All, I've been following the thread and have found responses very helpful. At the risk of sounding either realy lazy or stupid I'm wondering.... I have discovered that my Henry 2KD Classis has the ne
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00232.html (9,646 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Briggs <edbriggs@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:39:41 -0500
Inside the conduit or part of a single 10/3 non-metalic cable. Just for clarity, if you have metallic conduit, that would serve as the ground, and you would want three conductors inside: phase, phase
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00239.html (10,845 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: ka1xo@juno.com
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 04:45:01 GMT
Dear Mike, The Henry 2KD at 220vac input is said to consume 15 amps, tops. The #10AWG feed from your distribution panel, at 50 feet, is plenty of circular mils to not heat up when your key is down. T
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00246.html (7,395 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 08:25:04 -0800
** GFI breakers have a reputation for RF detection, so some ferrite beads and bypass caps may be needed. To pass NEC, the bypass caps must be 1400VDC-rated. If you want your station to be fully NEC-
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00254.html (8,165 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:14:11 -0500 (EST)
I regularly trip my GFI breaker when on 160 with 500+ watts output. Annoying. I finally broke down and have a cron job that emails a reminder to me to check the breaker in the morning before my wife
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00261.html (8,121 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 06:50:24 -0800
** Why not replace it with a plain-vanilla circuit breaker? ** Does she use the hair-dryer whilst in the tub? cheers, J. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contes
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00262.html (8,074 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Briggs <edbriggs@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:12:23 -0500
Rich, There is an implicit assumption that he loves his wife. Ed -- Original Message -- From: "R. Measures" <r@somis.org> To: <jsb@digistar.com> Cc: <ka1xo@juno.com>; <edbriggs@optonline.net>; <w9wis
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00264.html (8,846 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:20:16 -0800
** If he loved his wife, would the Ham amp be plugged-in in the bathroom? If I pulled that little stunt, the Ham amp and the Ham could easily wind up in the tub at the same time. ____________________
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00266.html (9,200 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:56:15 -0500 (EST)
heh - wired directly to the 200A mains? haw! no, I managed to find one of the few "good ones" out there. no, but she'd probably put me in the tub with the dryer if she knew how many kWh are being con
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00269.html (8,992 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <kh6jj@mobettah.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:53:42 -1000
Electricity in Boxborough, MA is approximately $0.0849 per kWh You should live in paradise where we pay over 26 cents per kWh. Not prudent to leave the 4-1000 idling on filament current even .. Merv
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00278.html (7,916 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:43:58 -0500 (EST)
good granny grunt. Solar/wind power should be affordable at those rates... _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00284.html (8,333 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] 220VOLT LINE...Redux and ?? (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <kh6jj@mobettah.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:02:02 -1000
j You should live in paradise where we pay over 26 cents per kWh. Not prudent to leave the 4-1000 idling on filament current even .. Merv KH6/K9FD Molokai Island Hawaii good granny grunt. Solar/wind
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00287.html (9,051 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu