Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+813\s+screen\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+813\s+screen\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 813 screen (score: 1): Author: jonathan white <jonathan.white20@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:09:12 +0000; Hi I hope you non`t think this trivial but..... Can anyone confirm one way or the other the placing of the internal screening plate at bottom of tube near base which is connected to a pin,and is grou; /archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00248.html (7,268 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] 813 screen (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:43:55 -0400; I dont believe that you will have a stability issue, even with plain bare sockets mounted at chassis height, in GG and on those bands. My 4x 813 160-10M grid driven Class C amp has them mounted so th; /archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00249.html (7,977 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] 813 screen (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 07:26:47 +0000; I'll echo Carl's comments - I don't think it makes any difference at all. Mine ran at around 2kV and were rock solid stable, even without the dreaded suppressor. And yes, they look great! Steve PS n; /archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00251.html (7,513 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]