Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+8877\s+tests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+8877\s+tests\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] 8877 tests (score: 1): Author: Dennis W0JX <w0jx@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT); If/when you build that amp be sure to put a glitch resistor in series with the anode supply to the tube. Old 8877's can get gassy. I cooked my Ebay 8877 for three days with only filament voltage and; /archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00369.html (6,635 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] 8877 tests (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:00:28 EDT; I have had exactly the same experience. I am beginning to think that the arc is a required part of the rehab procedure! 73/k5gw In a message dated 7/31/2008 10:52:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time, w0jx@; /archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00370.html (7,564 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] 8877 tests (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:37:13 -0400; Filament cooking does very little for an 8877 and it almost always has to be slowly brought up under current protected HV and bias. A bigger than normal glitch resistor will provide additional protec; /archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00371.html (7,808 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] 8877 tests (score: 1): Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:26:01 +0200; I think the 8877 with its oxyd cathode will getter via filament cooking. That should be done before bringing it up that way 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amp; /archives//html/Amps/2008-08/msg00025.html (8,683 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]