Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+AL\-1200\s+vs\s+AL\-1500\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+AL\-1200\s+vs\s+AL\-1500\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] AL-1200 vs AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:39:15 -0800; With good engineering practice, a 4-1000A / 8166 will deliver 3kW PEP. I know of no case where a 1200A7 has delivered this much. Amen to that. The A7 has 0.2pF of feedback and the Z7 has about one-th; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00813.html (10,087 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] AL-1200 vs AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:43:23 -0800; The 8877 has a 25w rated grid. In normal operation, the grid-dissipation is c. 8w. To me, this appears to be a good safety margin. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _____________; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00814.html (9,674 bytes)
23. [Amps] AL-1200 VS AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: "Dennis Sokol " <dajs@accnorwalk.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:48:31 -0500; Blake, I just clicked the link you gave. My results were different! 87 AL-1200's 57 AL-1500's 52.6% greater. That difference is significant. _______________________________________________ Amps maili; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00817.html (8,107 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] AL-1200 vs AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:09:57 EST; Re: 4-1000 vs 3CX1200 3kw output. I agree that no one has reported this kind of output from a 3CX1200 tube. At their current price tag it doesn't seem prudent to attempt this even though Eimac has pu; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00819.html (8,317 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] AL-1200 vs AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:35:50 -0800; Oh, it's more important than that! If you've ever tried to start an engine that's at about zero degrees, you'd appreciate such a "block warmer." (and oil-thinner, and battery pepper-upper.) 73, Geor; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00827.html (9,415 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] AL-1200 VS AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:36:41 -0500; Actually, it is probably neither. Here's why. I am the guy who programmed the database and its searches, using FrontPage. I am NOT a skilled programmer. The data are free-form, in each field, so, for; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00828.html (9,059 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] AL-1200 vs AL-1500 (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 03:59:28 -0800; He lives in N. Hollywood, George. - To start my '63 VW bus in zero degree weather I used to put a camping stove under the engine while I was cleaning up after breakfast. 15-min later, the engine and; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00848.html (10,203 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]