Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+AMP\s+Reflector\s+Quality\s+of\s+Information\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:10:02 -0400
Is it just me or has the quality of the content on this reflector gone downhill, bigtime? Bob W6TR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00226.html (6,457 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: Dick Knol <dick.knol@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:58:52 +0100
Sure it did. Once knowledgable people are kicked off and only the Administrators opinion can be aired the quality of the contributions goes down the drain. For more interesting contributions concerni
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00234.html (7,633 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:04:59 +0000
For me, the quantity has gone down, but the signal to noise ratio has improved. Steve _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00235.html (6,917 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Talmadge" <unclebudd@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:01:12 -0600
Bob, I don't think so. I still enjoy the reasonable responses that are offered. I do not miss the sniping and name calling that once was the norm here. I quit the YAHOO reflector for just that reason
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00236.html (7,846 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:37:39 -0400
I don't want to take sides here, as Dick seems to, but I have been on this amps reflector since it began. There are some extraordinarily strong egos in the amps community, and some intense bad blood
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00239.html (9,851 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:05:39 -0500
Wow. Everyone carries two buckets; one has water in it and the other gasoline. Everyone has to decide which bucket to use when they see a little fire break out. Everyone gets to make their own decis
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00240.html (8,455 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:21:47 EDT
Wow. Everyone carries two buckets; one has water in it and the other gasoline. Everyone has to decide which bucket to use when they see a little fire break out. Great analogy! I got to remember that
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00243.html (8,302 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: "Osten B Magnusson" <sm5dqc@areteadsl.se>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:27:00 +0100
But if gasoline is on fire, for heavens sake don't use water... (neither gasoline!) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00244.html (9,172 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:30:24 EDT
Is it just me or has the quality of the content on this reflector gone downhill, big time? Bob W6TR Bob, No I don't think the quality or content has gone down hill. Some previous members moved on to
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00245.html (8,893 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: Dick Knol <dick.knol@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:50:10 +0100
Pete, Thanks for the contribution, we will see when this subject will be killed by the Administrator. It's getting morning time in Georgia. My statement is not a matter of taking sides. However, I op
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00247.html (11,848 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:28:30 -0700
It shifts about like this from time to time. 73 to all, Gary...wa6fgi _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00248.html (9,037 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:26:33 -0700
I don't know when it began, but I've been here for at least 10 years. I'm mostly an "asker" rather than an "answerer" unless someone asks about something that I happen to have personal knowledge of (
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00250.html (9,462 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:52:32 +0000
For the record, there are *two* Yahoo amplifiers groups "related" to this AMPS mailing list (along with several others that are not). 1. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ham_amplifiers/ Founded: Sep 8,
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00252.html (9,144 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:17:52 -0400
OK folks ... I thought this would burn itself out but it has not. I do not want to return to moderating every post so let this thread die. The technical quality (signal to noise ratio) has greatly im
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00259.html (13,454 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:55:36 +0100
Where can I read the full reflector policy? Just in case... Don&acute;t like to be kicked off without knowing why. The policy on contesting.com is obviously incomplete since "discussion of reflector
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00264.html (8,914 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:43:50 +0100 (CET)
It must be remembered that if the list members disagree with the administrator, PROVIDED you've helped fund this list by subscribing/donating to eham.net (you all have, haven't you?), even administra
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00275.html (8,438 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu