- 1. [Amps] Alpha 87A amp (score: 1)
- Author: N8NGA@one.net (Bob Otto N8NGA)
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:38:54 -0400
- Forgive me if this is a subject covered......I'm new to the= list. I'm considering purchasing a Alpha 87A amp 1Q03. The price has= increased substantially since the new ownership. Does anyone= have e
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-10/msg00170.html (7,548 bytes)
- 2. [Amps] Alpha 87A amp (score: 1)
- Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:14:15 -0400
- Of course, Alpha's main competitor in this performance and price class is the ACOM 2000A. I have owned two ACOMs and two 87As. I now run only the older battleship Alphas. Anyway... Both the 87A and A
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-10/msg00173.html (11,305 bytes)
- 3. [Amps] Alpha 87A amp (score: 1)
- Author: 2@vc.net (Rich)
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:44:38 -0700
- Did either 87A require return to Alpha? If so, what were the symptoms? tnx - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-10/msg00174.html (12,818 bytes)
- 4. [Amps] Alpha 87A amp (score: 1)
- Author: N8NGA@one.net (Bob Otto N8NGA)
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:01:13 -0400
- Worth lots of $$s.........thanks for the response. When did you= buy the 87A....after the new ownership? 73 from.... Bob Otto =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0,,,,,,, =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=D4=BF=D4=AC =A0=
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-10/msg00175.html (13,089 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu