Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s+9500\s+Versus\s+ACOM\s+2000A\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Alpha\s+9500\s+Versus\s+ACOM\s+2000A\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Alpha 9500 Versus ACOM 2000A (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Okamitsu <w3kl@w3kl.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:51:35 -0700 (PDT); I'm considering acquiring an autotune amplifier. I prefer a tube amp and not a solid-state amp. The choices, as I see it, are between the Alpha 9500 and the ACOM 2000A. I am looking for **object; /archives//html/Amps/2008-10/msg00000.html (6,475 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Alpha 9500 Versus ACOM 2000A (score: 1): Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:16:11 -0400; Buy USA. Their service after the sale will be better. I'm considering acquiring an autotune amplifier. I prefer a tube amp and not a solid-state amp. The choices, as I see it, are between the Alpha 9; /archives//html/Amps/2008-10/msg00001.html (8,373 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Alpha 9500 Versus ACOM 2000A (score: 1): Author: "Paul Young" <paul@g0hwc.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:48:34 +0100; I have found Alpha's back up service "Excellent" and Im in UK Paul G0HWC http://www.g0hwc.com -- _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/Amps/2008-10/msg00002.html (9,944 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Alpha 9500 Versus ACOM 2000A (score: 1): Author: Felipe Ceglia <felipeceglia2@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:17:41 -0300; Hi, A friend of mine has recently been fixing an ACOM amplifier, and their support was excellent. 73, Felipe - PY1NB _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.; /archives//html/Amps/2008-10/msg00004.html (8,335 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]