Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+172\,\s+Issue\s+34\,\s+topic\s+1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+172\,\s+Issue\s+34\,\s+topic\s+1\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 172, Issue 34, topic 1 (score: 1): Author: Gary Smith via Amps <amps@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:00:43 -0700; A few years back we had a 2011 Toyota Prius. When I decided to install a vhf/uhf rig, I contacted Toyota with concerns about the on-board computer. What I received was a nice two page letter on where; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00135.html (13,518 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 172, Issue 34, topic 1 (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:22:17 -0700; VHF/UHF in a vehicle is FAR less likely to cause problems with automotive electronics that HF. Two very important reasons. First, power levels are generally a LOT lower. Few rigs put out more than 50; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00136.html (9,768 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]