Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Anodize\s+versus\s+alodine\/chromate\s+conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Anodize\s+versus\s+alodine\/chromate\s+conversion\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Anodize versus alodine/chromate conversion (score: 1): Author: jtml@lanl.gov (John T. M. Lyles); Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:55:09 -0700; Its true that anodize is a non conductive hard coating on aluminum while the alodine/iridite/etc are chromate conversion coatings which are quite conductive. They stabilize the aluminum from the long; /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00119.html (7,594 bytes)
2. [Amps] Anodize versus alodine/chromate conversion (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:11:30 -0500; Actually, using lock washers to dig thru surface is a good idea unless you have gold plated chassis. Almost all surfaces, particularly aluminum become oxidized. Using a "star" external tooth lock was; /archives//html/Amps/2003-01/msg00120.html (8,776 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]