Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+April\s+QST\s+article\s+on\s+RF\s+power\s+tube\s+test\s+stand\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] April QST article on RF power tube test stand (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:13:50 -0500
Seems to me like a lot of work when, if you have an amp that uses a tube you want to check out, you can just put a variac in the line to the plate transformer primary and pretty much have what they b
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00201.html (7,421 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] April QST article on RF power tube test stand (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Young <weeksmgr@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:54:01 -0500
I have used my AL-1500 and AL-82 many times to test 8877 and 3-500 tubes of unknown condition. With the primary connections on the plate transformer being push on spade lugs, it is simple to unplug i
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00202.html (8,656 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] April QST article on RF power tube test stand (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:30:24 -0400
Its a mostly waste of time as built. A little more work and it could be useful to do emissions tests as well as proper (safe) gettering. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00203.html (8,902 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] April QST article on RF power tube test stand (score: 1)
Author: Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 08:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Carl, I would be very interested in your ideas on what should be added. My opinion was also that it was a bit limited (keeping in mind my absolute beginner status in high power amps) and could stand
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00204.html (7,969 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] April QST article on RF power tube test stand (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:02:52 -0400
Ive outlined the steps several times on here under gettering, see the archives. Carl KM1H Carl, I would be very interested in your ideas on what should be added. My opinion was also that it was a bit
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00206.html (9,106 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] April QST article on RF power tube test stand (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Colello" <colellos@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:15:47 -0400
Please, how do you get to the archives? Steve KA2KON _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00208.html (11,009 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] April QST article on RF power tube test stand (score: 1)
Author: "Cliff K3LL" <K3LL@EEContent.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 12:38:57 -0700
http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/Amps/ or for a more snarky response.... http://lmgtfy.com/?q=amps+mailing+list+archive 73, Cliff K3LL --Original Message-- From: amps-bounces@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2012-03/msg00209.html (11,305 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu