Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Big\s+Solid\s+State\s+Power\s+Amplifiers\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: gw4dgu@blaenffos.org
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 19:38:47 -0000
I don't disagree at all with this. The point I was trying - however ineptly - to make is that solid state technology requires a different approach to traditional tube design. work of to Again, I don
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00242.html (7,798 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 04:34:03 -0800
** The main difference being that combiners are the norm with solid-state due to the practical limit of a few hundred watts per module. Also, for the same number of watts of RF out, due to more wast
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00248.html (9,088 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@qsl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:54:19 +0000
Is it all that different? Whatever the technology, different devices offer benefits/disadvantages. The feedback systems are most easily applied round a transmitter rather than an amplifier, and I'm n
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00250.html (8,245 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: gw4dgu@blaenffos.org
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:53:26 -0000
I don't know what designs you are familiar with, but combiner losses don't usually impact significantly on efficiency. That's why they are used in high-efficiency AM BC transmitters... The use of mod
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00251.html (8,637 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 08:25:05 -0800
**High-efficiency BC-type designs are not suitable for applications where linear operation over a range of frequencies is required. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00255.html (7,640 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: gw4dgu@blaenffos.org
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:11:14 -0000
don't In terms of fractional bandwidth BC transmitters covering 500 - 1650kHz aren't narrow-band! Of course BC transmitters are designed for AM, and aren't linear, but there are people using class-D
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00256.html (9,104 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 02:21:41 -0800
** Dr. Schmidt. Please explain why high-efficiency BC-type designs are suitable for applications where linear operation over a range of frequencies is required. Tnx _________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00259.html (9,302 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Steven Grant W4IIV <stevengrant98@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:32:24 -0800 (PST)
http://hawkins.pair.com/wabcnow.shtml should give you a heads up on the operation of these broadcasting beasts. they are totally digital, and uses square waves for RF genoration...they are not linear
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00267.html (11,132 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:12:10 -0800
** Not linear is OK for SSB? The difference in S-units between an amplifier that 60% efficient and an amplifier that is 90% efficient - for the same power input - is 0.3 S-units, or 1.76db. _________
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00272.html (11,361 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: Steven Grant W4IIV <stevengrant98@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:49:20 -0800 (PST)
no rich..not ok for SSB nor for shortwave...something to do with switching speeds. i assume when i say not linear, i also mean not good for SSB also a question not related to this thread......what wo
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00273.html (12,029 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:09:33 -0800
** So why would a Ham want a not-linear amplifier? ** The bandswitch in a SB-220 is not very ok with a 3800vdc anode supply. 3000v is close to the limit for a SB-220. If one needs more output it tak
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00274.html (12,227 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 01:52:39 -0800
** I have yet to hear a Ham station on SSB who is getting 90% efficiency from his/her linear amplifier. My SB-220 linear amplifier probably uses c. $1.20 worth of electricity per month. Going to 90%
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00277.html (12,174 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Big Solid State Power Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:22:28 -0800
The 90% efficiency thing actually make some sense from a weight standpoint if you consider amps intended for DXpedition style operation. Of course this assumes that all of the circuitry needed to lin
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00288.html (13,788 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu