Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bird\s+accuracy\,\s+etc\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Bird\s+accuracy\,\s+etc\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Bird accuracy, etc. (score: 1): Author: "Roy Koeppe" <royanjoy@ncn.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:29:04 -0600; Concering, "Now if instead of an anlogue meter, the Bird 43 had a digital readout to 3 places of decimals, people would believe it implicitly, because it would be digital......and digital read outs h; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00199.html (7,166 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Bird accuracy, etc. (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:04:51 +0100 (CET); Have you calibrated that? For Type Approval testing, many standards call for the measurement of power to +/-0.75dB for a measurement certainty of 95%. That's in a certifed laboratory, with traceable; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00201.html (7,951 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Bird accuracy, etc. (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 11:31:54 -0500; Peter, What I've found is there's a lot of meters out there just as good as, if not better than a Bird 43. Bird uses the simple principle of using a strip line (their term thru-line) to measure power; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00203.html (9,395 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Bird accuracy, etc. (score: 1): Author: "Roy Koeppe" <royanjoy@ncn.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 11:32:47 -0600; " Accuracy is essentially that of the voltmeter, typically 3 percent." "Have you calibrated that?" Better VOMs, VTVMs and equivalent I believe are typically quite accurate when reading DC voltages ne; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00212.html (7,323 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]