Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CBer\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CBer\?\?\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: vk6apk@eon.net.au (Alek Petkovic); Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 12:08:22 +0800; "_-_-bear WB2GCR" I read that as CBer WB2GCR. Apologies to Randall if that is not the case. 73 Alek, VK6APK; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00053.html (7,134 bytes)
2. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: TimNebo@aol.com (TimNebo@aol.com); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:27:43 EST; this is a technical group and not a radio politics group. please leave it that way. 73 de Tim Kp82 www.KpDxGroup.net "The ability to make (and keep) many friends on the band, is the most powerful cap; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00061.html (7,631 bytes)
3. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: kg7da@foxinternet.net (Allen (Marty) Martin); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 06:38:52 -0800; Why would a cb'er have any interest in amps or dx etc. as they are not legal activities on cb? Marty not; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00062.html (8,556 bytes)
4. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: TimNebo@aol.com (TimNebo@aol.com); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:46:24 EST; marty, this is the real world we live in. information and discussions are never illegal regardless of what radio service one chooses to use. if you wish to censor your discussions with others based; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00063.html (8,183 bytes)
5. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (wl fuqua); Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:06:17 -0500; That is too bad. But practically none are illegal operators. They are broadcast engineers and electrical engineers. The above statement can't be translated as some of the best RF minds in the world a; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00064.html (7,874 bytes)
6. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: TimNebo@aol.com (TimNebo@aol.com); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:14:39 EST; thank you for your input bill, please explain how you never having been a cb'er makes you any better of a rf technician than the next guy. curious minds are listening. 73 de Tim Kp82 www.KpDxGroup.n; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00066.html (7,925 bytes)
7. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (wl fuqua); Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:52:55 -0500; I was raised to obey laws. So when after listing to shortwave for a few years I became interested in becoming a radio operator. Those days you had to have a CB license to operate and to obtain one yo; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00067.html (9,993 bytes)
8. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: TimNebo@aol.com (TimNebo@aol.com); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:32:51 EST; I lots interesting response bill. thank you very much. but i must say i've taken quite the different path as you and i'm still on my long journey to reach a place where most of the men on this list h; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00069.html (14,045 bytes)
9. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (Rich); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:18:37 -0800; ** not bad, not bad. Congrats. What year was this? - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00070.html (8,101 bytes)
10. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: on4kj@skynet.be (on4kj); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:37:13 -0000; Of topic ...........Some are building the wrong "Amplifier". Just remember " the rules are the rules "........ statewide even stateside I supose. Wanna be " Chicken bander " OK " Wanna be " Ham " Ok; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00075.html (16,021 bytes)
11. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:42:48 -0500; Well, I guess there's one good thing about the declining sunspot cycle. 73, Pete N4ZR; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00076.html (7,843 bytes)
12. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: mark@sandlabs.com (mark); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:08:21 -0500; Well, In contrast with Mr. FuQua, I am quite young... Only 24, you see ... However I had been able to acumulate 2 MS (Physics and EE) from MIT and one PhD (BioMaterials) from Pasteur France ... Acord; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00080.html (15,839 bytes)
13. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (Rich); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:51:04 -0800; It might be interesting to check these claims out with said institutions. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00081.html (17,040 bytes)
14. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: k7rdx@earthlink.net (k7rdx); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:31:41 -0800; Might want to require proof of license to banter on this reflector? 73 all, Jim. -- Original Message -- From: Rich <2@vc.net> To: mark <mark@sandlabs.com>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday,; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00082.html (18,555 bytes)
15. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill L. Fuqua); Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 23:57:36 -0500; Hi Alex Sandbrand. See you have another name today. If you have forgotten you call is N2NNU 73 Bill wa4lav Well, In contrast with Mr. FuQua, I am quite young... Only 24, you see ... However I had bee; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00083.html (15,736 bytes)
16. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: W0YR@aol.com (W0YR@aol.com); Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 03:26:07 -0500; How about knocking off this tit-for-tat stuff? If you have a private beef, send e-mails to each other, privately. Merry Christmas. Mike W0YR; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00084.html (7,217 bytes)
17. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: vfrpilot@bellsouth.net (Patrick Riggins); Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:31:56 GMT; Nice thought until everything was "cc'd" to the mailing list. Patrick; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00085.html (7,534 bytes)
18. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (Rich); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 05:00:19 -0800; I have run into several such cases so far on the Internet with one person pretending to be several. In two of these cases, the imposter also had a group of faithful supporters who testified as to th; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00087.html (19,862 bytes)
19. [Amps] CBer?? (score: 1): Author: k6nd@netzero.com (Will); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:03:18 GMT; OK guys, time to go back to amplifiers! Best regards, Will, K6ND Well, In contrast with Mr. FuQua, I am quite young... Only 24, you see ... However I had been able to acumulate 2 MS (Physics and EE); /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00088.html (7,479 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]