Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Chimney\s+materials\s+\-\s+Loss\s+or\s+not\s+TSPA\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Chimney materials - Loss or not TSPA (score: 1)
Author: "John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:03:08 -0600
Air cooled tube chimneys seem to be a big topic these days, as much as discussion of EPAY and that other service. I want to suggest that people consider that these chimneys are typically situated at
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00250.html (10,488 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Chimney materials - Loss or not TSPA (score: 1)
Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:21:25 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
John says we should be conservative in design of the rf deck. He probably is conservative in the power supply, too. Well, as we get older and older, the amplifier is perhaps the last arena we can gen
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00251.html (12,397 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Chimney materials - Loss or not TSPA (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:21:52 -0400
John, On homebrewed amps, it's better to think about mounting the tubes as far away from the chassis sides/back/front as possible. In commercial amps you have to take what they make, but when buildin
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00252.html (12,737 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Chimney materials - Loss or not TSPA (score: 1)
Author: jkearman@att.net (Jim Kearman)
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:35:13 +0000
Why not Teflon? Thin sheet is not expensive and rolls nicely around the anode cooler. That's what I have for my amp. 73, Jim, KR1S http://kr1s.kearman.com/ ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00253.html (7,879 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Chimney materials - Loss or not TSPA (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:41:29 -0400
Teflon is good as several have used it. I'm wondering about the other plastics for use as stand offs and choke forms. You can do them with teflon also but it is more expensive than some other plastic
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00255.html (8,717 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Chimney materials - Loss or not TSPA (score: 1)
Author: Tony King - W4ZT <amps080605@w4zt.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:47:33 -0400
Those pictures are here: <http://gs35b.com/pvc/> 73, Tony W4ZT <snip> _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00256.html (7,854 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Chimney materials - Loss or not TSPA (score: 1)
Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Fascinating webpage, Tony. Thanks!! Joe, N3JI Those pictures are here: 73, Tony W4ZT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00258.html (8,329 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Chimney materials - Loss or not TSPA (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:50:04 +0100
I think he microwave oven test does provide useful information - within its limitations, of course. If you test similar samples of various materials at the same time (relying on the turntable or mode
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00259.html (10,208 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Chimney materials - Loss or not TSPA (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:45:32 -0700
I have offered this suggestion before but I will offer it again: Ameritron (MFJ) will sell the chimneys that are used in the AL-800/800H amps. These fit nice and snug around the 3cxp800a7 tubes used
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00268.html (11,497 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu