Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Compact\s+Coil\s+Concept\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Compact\s+Coil\s+Concept\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Compact Coil Concept (score: 1): Author: "wc6w@juno.com" <wc6w@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:45:03 GMT; The 160 meter portion, even employing a reduced diameter conductor, requires almost half the total space in a Pi-Coil. Has anyone ever seen a multilayer approach to this portion of the coil? For inst; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00520.html (7,206 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Compact Coil Concept (score: 1): Author: ToddRoberts2001@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:24:09 EST; Five turns of #8, space wound 5 TPI on each layer 1" wide at a 2.5" average (2" - 2.5" - 3" layers) diameter would provide something in the vicinity of 17 uH. This is approximately double the inducta; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00522.html (7,301 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Compact Coil Concept (score: 1): Author: "wc6w@juno.com" <wc6w@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:44:40 GMT; Hi everyone, Thanks for the comments on my coil idea. No one mentioned in either public or private communication that it has been tried...so, I guess it is up to me. :-) I'm not particularly worried; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00542.html (8,608 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]