- 1. [Amps] Degreasing Ceramic (score: 1)
- Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:35:49 -0500
- In the paragraph below do you actually mean trichloroethylene or do you refer to 1,1 Trichloroethane (Methyl Chloroform)? The former, trichloroethylene, smells completely different than the chlorofor
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00504.html (7,879 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] Degreasing Ceramic (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill L. Fuqua" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:42:24 -0500
- IBM did not have an exclusive on trichloroethane. Just about all companies using rosin flux on their solder line used trichloroethane to clean off the flux. Now days an acid flux is used because it c
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00508.html (10,009 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] Degreasing Ceramic (score: 1)
- Author: Tomm Aldridge <KD7QAE@ARRL.NET>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 03:49:03 +0000
- Trichlor (short for trichloroethylene) is also nasty s*it. It was used wholesale as a parts degreaser by the military and industry and then banned sometime in the 70's as a general use solvent. I had
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00517.html (10,562 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu