Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Drake\s+L4\-B\s+for\s+6\s+meters\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Drake\s+L4\-B\s+for\s+6\s+meters\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Drake L4-B for 6 meters ? (score: 1): Author: "Jack Colson" <jackcolson@netsignia.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:51:47 -0400; I wonder if anyone has converted the Drake L4B for 6 meters. Its basic construction would make it a candidate. Thoughts? 73 Jack, W3TMZ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing li; /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00194.html (6,672 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Drake L4-B for 6 meters ? (score: 1): Author: rlm <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 03:52:16 -0700; ** The Tune-C probably needs to be closer to the tubes for 6m, On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 12:51 PM, Jack Colson wrote: I wonder if anyone has converted the Drake L4B for 6 meters. Its basic cons; /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00201.html (7,573 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]