- 1. [Amps] Eimac vs Svetlana (score: 1)
- Author: vk6apk@eon.net.au (Alek Petkovic)
- Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 07:36:50 +0800
- G'day form sunny Perth, I found out something interesting a few days ago which may be of interest to the assembled masses. A few mates and myself were lucky enough to pick up some decommissioned 1kW
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00095.html (7,785 bytes)
- 2. [Amps] Eimac vs Svetlana (score: 1)
- Author: Karl-Arne Markström <sm0aom@telia.com> (Karl-Arne Markström)
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:23:52 +0100
- I can second this. My organization (Stockholm Radio) runs several Collins 208U-10 10 kW amplifiers for air/ground SSB services that used Eimac 4CX350A's in the driver chain. During the final time bef
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00097.html (10,165 bytes)
- 3. [Amps] Eimac vs Svetlana (score: 1)
- Author: 2@vc.net (Rich)
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 06:08:21 -0800
- Amen, Karl-Arne. Eimac seemingly began a long slide downhill after it was acquired by Varian. The sweetheart monopoly contract Eimac/Varian signed with Eddie Richardson was a good clue that something
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00106.html (11,505 bytes)
- 4. [Amps] Eimac vs Svetlana (score: 1)
- Author: W6NQ <w6nq@rfparts.com> (W6NQ)
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:54:01 -0800
- The company I work for supplies the Svetlana 4CX350A tube to the Coast Guard and other government customers. The buyers verify that the 4CX350A Svetlana tube significantly outlasts the current produc
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00219.html (7,520 bytes)
- 5. [Amps] Eimac vs Svetlana (score: 1)
- Author: helge.skram@med.ge.com (Skram, Helge (MED))
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:39:50 +0100
- Hello I confronted Eimac with the information below, concerning quality of Eimac vs Svetlana. In a previous posting there were more statements about Eimac that were strange. I am interested in this,
- /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00222.html (13,850 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu