Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+FW\:\s+\[Boatanchors\]\s+Best\s+Boatanchor\s+160\-10mReceiversforSSB\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 12:15:45 -0400
The RF gain control does indeed control the RF stage on the 2B. If you have problems with overload on those receivers you most likely have a leaky capacitor somewhere in the AGC circuit or a tube wit
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00057.html (11,705 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 12:40:43 -0500
If you wind up with an old AM/CW rx with a 455 KHz IF you can keep a look out for a hammarlund HC-10 and it will give you SSB coverage and maintain the tube signal chain. I don't know what the prices
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00059.html (6,908 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 14:21:40 -0400
With HC10 going for more than receivers such as HQ180s and HQ170s why would you buy one? These have the same IF ans in the HC10. 73 Bill wa4lav If you wind up with an old AM/CW rx with a 455 KHz IF y
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00060.html (8,026 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:15:57 -0500
Because I did not know they were going for that much. Where do you see the high prices? under tables at flea markets? Rob K5UJ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@c
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00062.html (8,876 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:30:54 -0400
I paid $100-150 for the 3 of mine but Ive seen them over $400 on Fleabay. The CE B Slicer and one from RME are others I use that cost a lot less. Carl KM1H -- Original Message -- From: "Rob Atkinson"
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00063.html (10,555 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:31:11 -0400
Because they go well with a R-390/390A, HRO-60, and other radios that are approaching or above $1000 these days. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@conte
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00065.html (10,398 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:48:47 -0400
You know, I have never tried the CE slicer. How has had some experience with it? I assume it is phaseing. wa4lav I paid $100-150 for the 3 of mine but Ive seen them over $400 on Fleabay. The CE B Sli
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00066.html (10,759 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: <k2dp@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:15:19 -0500
OM's, FWIW, the Collins 75A-4 covers 160 mtrs, what else would you ever need for 160 ? 73, Dave -- Original Message -- From: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> To: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; "Rob A
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00067.html (12,764 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 18:37:23 -0400
As stock? An AM filter and keep it way up at the high end. Carl KM1H -- Original Message -- From: <k2dp@charter.net> To: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; "Rob Atkinson
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00068.html (13,818 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 20:47:41 -0400
They are fine for a BA but not as good as the Hammarlund (either version), the TMC, GE, CV-591, CV-1694, CV-1758, and others all which will set you back serious money. Dont laugh too hard but one is
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00069.html (11,983 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB? (score: 1)
Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 18:02:47 -0700
"The RF gain control does indeed control the RF stage on the 2B. If you have problems with overload on those receivers you most likely have a leaky capacitor somewhere in the AGC circuit or a tube wi
/archives//html/Amps/2011-06/msg00070.html (10,511 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu