Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+FW\:\s+PEP\s+power\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+FW\:\s+PEP\s+power\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] FW: PEP power.. (score: 1): Author: "Larry Carman" <lncarman@swbell.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:24:42 -0500; less instantaneous peak voltage necessary to produce the same PEP with a given audio frequency. Is this correct? If so, wouldn't a wide band RF signal be less detectable on the receiving end than th; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00169.html (7,810 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] FW: PEP power.. (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:31:08 +0100; No, it's a complete fallacy. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@cont; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00176.html (6,826 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]