Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Glass\s+Vs\.\s+Ceramic\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Glass\s+Vs\.\s+Ceramic\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Glass Vs. Ceramic? (score: 1): Author: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:34:08 -0700 (PDT); Hello all...I'm in the process of scouting around for an amp and was wondering what some of the main advantages would be to a ceramic tube versus a glass one...??? I was looking at the Ameritron Al-1; /archives//html/Amps/2008-04/msg00087.html (6,764 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Glass Vs. Ceramic? (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 07:08:12 -0700; Mornin' Dave. Much more modern tube design is one good reason. Another is they are easier to locate when the last vestiges of RF have been wrung out of them. My AL-800H has two metal/ceramic jugs in; /archives//html/Amps/2008-04/msg00088.html (9,012 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Glass Vs. Ceramic? (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 07:09:09 -0700; _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2008-04/msg00089.html (10,047 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Glass Vs. Ceramic? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:20:18 -0400; The primary advantage of ceramic is that many are higher power than the glass. You also pay a lot more up front and for replacement. The AL-1200 is capable of 2200W+ output as are the pair of 3CX800; /archives//html/Amps/2008-04/msg00090.html (8,378 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]