Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Help\s+constructing\s+filament\s+choke\s+for\s+pair\s+of\s+3\-500Zs\s+on\s+6\s+m\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Help constructing filament choke for pair of 3-500Zs on 6 m (score: 1)
Author: John Farber <kg6i@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:02:58 +0000 (UTC)
I could use some info on constructing a suitable filament choke for a pair of 3-500Zs on 6 m, my current amp project. My gut feeling is a standard choke design for 80-10 would not be correct due to t
/archives//html/Amps/2013-06/msg00266.html (7,091 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Help constructing filament choke for pair of 3-500Zs on 6 m (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:20:21 -0400
Do the math. A reactance of 10 times the input impedance of the tubes is sufficient to have the choke "invisible" to the input RF. Carl KM1H I could use some info on constructing a suitable filament
/archives//html/Amps/2013-06/msg00267.html (8,435 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Help constructing filament choke for pair of 3-500Zs on 6 m (score: 1)
Author: Paul Baldock <paul@paulbaldock.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:23:58 -0700
The standard ferrite rod that you use for 10-80M works fine. I've moded quite a few amps for 6 M and I remove half the turns from the original choke. This reduces the inductance by a factor 4 and wor
/archives//html/Amps/2013-06/msg00268.html (9,292 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Help constructing filament choke for pair of 3-500Zs on 6 m (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:02:40 +0000
There is substitute for experience. 73 Bill wa4lav The standard ferrite rod that you use for 10-80M works fine. I've moded quite a few amps for 6 M and I remove half the turns from the original choke
/archives//html/Amps/2013-06/msg00278.html (10,770 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu