Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Input\s+SWR\s+revisited\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Input\s+SWR\s+revisited\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:29:56 -0500; I think this guy just wants to argue, Gerry. 73, Roger _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2015-01/msg00120.html (8,023 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited (score: 1): Author: "Robert Carroll" <w2wg@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:00:38 -0500; Hopefully no one would run a multi quarter wave line for a match in the shack since, if you look at the Smith chart, you are back to where you started after a 360 angular rotation on the chart. The p; /archives//html/Amps/2015-01/msg00121.html (13,125 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:08:27 -0600; Quoting Robert Carroll <w2wg@comcast.net>: The point is if you match the transceiver and make it happy with a particular length of line, the SWR in the line is close to meaningless from a loss standp; /archives//html/Amps/2015-01/msg00122.html (9,275 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:24:25 -0500; These days such calculations are most easily done on a computer but an understanding of the Smith chart and the equations it is based on will help in understanding how the match is taking place. Ther; /archives//html/Amps/2015-01/msg00123.html (10,113 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited (score: 1): Author: "Robert Carroll" <w2wg@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:34:18 -0500; Those are what I use as well. I think they are the best around. I hope ARRL keeps including them in handbooks. 73 Bob easily done on a computer but an understanding of the Smith chart and the equatio; /archives//html/Amps/2015-01/msg00124.html (10,104 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:04:27 -0800; Not true Gary. And we are not talking about using a tuner between the solid state exciter and the amplifier. 73 Jim W7RY It means that-- if you are looking at the SWR at your radio and there is a tun; /archives//html/Amps/2015-01/msg00125.html (11,586 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@largeriver.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:09:52 -0600; Hi Jim, Good to hear from you again. Yet it is true! Some guys earlier were saying that they were using the tuner inside of their radios feeding their amp. And some claimed that the SWR would change; /archives//html/Amps/2015-01/msg00126.html (12,436 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]