Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Is\s+it\s+legal\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Is\s+it\s+legal\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Is it legal? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 01:59:56 +0000; Something just occurred to me about the Harris RF-110A: Is it legal for amateur use? It is certainly commercially built but apparently not FCC type-accepted. Way too much gain for example. You can ho; /archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00089.html (6,560 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Is it legal? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 07:18:40 -0500; amateur use? It is certainly commercially built but apparently not FCC type-accepted. Way too much gain for example." The FCC no longer requires Type Acceptance. The NPR for that change occurred in; /archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00090.html (9,406 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Is it legal? (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <n2bc@stny.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 07:45:15 -0500; I'm no lawyer, but I suspect that since it was manufactured ages before FCC type acceptance was invented that it is OK. Plus, it is cleaner (IMD) than most amps today - the 4CX1500B was a bit of a jo; /archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00091.html (7,719 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Is it legal? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:37:01 -0500; It's "my understanding" the rules apply only to equipment built specifically for the amateur service. IOW, you can adapt anything that was not meant for the amateur service and you are "supposed to k; /archives//html/Amps/2016-12/msg00100.html (9,088 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]