Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Nat\s+NCL2000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Nat\s+NCL2000\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1): Author: HOWARDLYON@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:34:36 EST; Hi guys Trying to renovate an old NCL2000. Hadda shotgun the doubler board. The caps were teenagers with pimples and whiteheads everywhere. The dividers were all outta spec... 75k to 120k!~!~! New bo; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00379.html (6,830 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:14:10 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ All the experts - 99.99% - recommend NOT using ALC derived from the amp to feed back to the TX. Tune the amp at maximum output and; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00422.html (7,137 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:29:32 +0100 (CET); I'm not that convinced that any ALC really does....it's usually implemented such that it's trying to close the door after the horse has bolted. I suspect that to avoid that approach, the ALC needs to; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00448.html (7,905 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:42:38 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I would have to agree. At the transceiver level it may prevent some accidental overdrive such as when you knock the mike over. I do; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00449.html (7,306 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:26:30 -0800; The word is "flatulent" or "flatulence". Personally I think it stinks. Others say its a gas. 73, Gary...wa6fgi _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00452.html (8,625 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:48:44 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Not on this reflector. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com htt; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00479.html (7,291 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1): Author: "m.ford" <k1ern@direcway.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:26:53 -0500; I have rebuilt a number of these boards. I can't quite picture the configuration you describe. Do you have a photo? Also you might want to reconsider using the Dale for a glitch resistor. It will bec; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00507.html (9,755 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1): Author: HOWARDLYON@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:04:02 EST; dividers were 68uF/450V/105* stacks; I have rebuilt a number of these boards. I can't quite picture the configuration you describe. What caps did ya use? The caps (DigiKey P11692) rated at 0.76Arippl; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00516.html (11,606 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1): Author: "m.ford" <k1ern@direcway.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:50:35 -0500; (CDE WBR100-450 or MALLORY TC80) (I use K2AW HV6-1 modules in place of the oem solitrons) (The changeover relay is loud. By using a dual footswitch you key the amp first, before the exciter and the s; /archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00518.html (12,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]