Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Open\s+Reply\s+to\s+Steve\s+Cook\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Open\s+Reply\s+to\s+Steve\s+Cook\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Open Reply to Steve Cook (score: 1): Author: Jeff Weinberg W8CQ <w8cqjeff@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:34:26 -0500; Hi Everyone, I am not going to drag this out. I will make one reply to Steve's comments and leave it at that. He is telling his side and I will tell mine. I tried to help Steve with a custom design u; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00701.html (8,434 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Open Reply to Steve Cook (score: 1): Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:11:59 -0800; Jeff, As they say "You can please some of the people some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the time). I for one appreciate the things that you do supply at a very reasonable; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00703.html (9,481 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Open Reply to Steve Cook (score: 1): Author: "David Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:42:10 -0500; OK, time for my $.02. In the last month I have bought 2 transformers from Jeff, and other stuff as well. He has been helpful & straight-forward in all transactions, and both transformers were designs; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00704.html (12,114 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Open Reply to Steve Cook (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:08:46 -0500; Im well aware of your relationship with Chris Jeff and I wasnt tossing any grief in your direction. Who do you think Ive been using for years since its a short drive away? I havent bought a fresh bui; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00707.html (10,749 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Open Reply to Steve Cook (score: 1): Author: "Steve Cook" <sccook1@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:26:05 -0700; Really... Well let's see Jeff. You jerked me around for over 2 months when you could have come clean. Nothing I said is untruthful -- sorry you are "embarrassed." Perhaps you should rethink your busi; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00715.html (9,748 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Open Reply to Steve Cook (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:15:54 -0800; Based on what I hear from Jeff, which sounds entirely plausible, it would seem that it is YOU who should be embarrassed. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00719.html (7,690 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Open Reply to Steve Cook (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:42:42 -0500; Will someone please get Steve to sit down and be quiet? 73, Pete N4ZR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00738.html (11,093 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Open Reply to Steve Cook (score: 1): Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:01:53 +0000 (GMT); Be patient. He may electrocute himself. Will someone please get Steve to sit down and be quiet? 73, Pete N4ZR you're not price based make _______________________________________________ Amps mailing; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00739.html (11,958 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]