Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Over\s+running\s+modulation\s+\/AF\s+transformers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Over\s+running\s+modulation\s+\/AF\s+transformers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Over running modulation /AF transformers (score: 1): Author: "Barry Kirkwood" <barry.kirkwood@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:10:55 +0000; Usually easy. First limiting factor is power at lower audio frequency. If for speech only, simply ensure a falling frequency response below say 800Hz, with lots of attenuation below 200Hz or so. 73 B; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00137.html (6,603 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Over running modulation /AF transformers (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:57:20 -0500; Well, limiting may be a limiting factor; pardon the pun. Since I'm going to be using some audio processing and negative peak limiting my average power will be up a fair amount. Im also going to be bo; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00138.html (7,735 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Over running modulation /AF transformers (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:16:29 -0500; Carl: A caution on running a transformer beyond its original design. After "processing" the audio response in the modulator must be flat flat flat and if the iron has poor response as a result of you; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00144.html (10,705 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]