Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PEER\s+REVIEW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PEER\s+REVIEW\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] PEER REVIEW (score: 1): Author: Herzog <herzog@frontiernet.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:09:13 -0400; ref: >We all this peer group, just unpaid, and only mildly biased. magical truths. REPLY: Peer reviews should be done before publication, not after. 73, Bill W6WRT == Herzog had hoped my status was t; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00590.html (6,625 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] PEER REVIEW (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:00:55 -0500; I think it's against the law to peer in our community...... Don WA4NPL _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin; /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00601.html (7,855 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]