Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PIV\s+requirements\s+for\s+identical\,\s+individual\s+diodes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PIV\s+requirements\s+for\s+identical\,\s+individual\s+diodes\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] PIV requirements for identical, individual diodes (score: 1): Author: Gene May <gene-may@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:23:42 -0400; Reference the thread about this: The PIV across each diode in a bridge will be the peak voltage of the transformer voltage. . . . . , I offer some words of caution: How the reverse voltage disributes; /archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00240.html (8,606 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] PIV requirements for identical, individual diodes (score: 1): Author: Gene May <gene-may@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:49:24 -0400; Good question, thanks. This was done a couple of decades ago, I admit. I can't remember the part number, but they were rated at 2.5 amp and all the same lot from a major reputable manufacturer. I've; /archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00241.html (9,725 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] PIV requirements for identical, individual diodes (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:18:08 -0400; Gene, That was true for the old diodes before the 80's or so. I can't remember when the modern ones came on the market. The diodes today have an avalanche region that is similar to a zener diode acro; /archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00242.html (11,442 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]