Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PL\s+network\s+adjustment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PL\s+network\s+adjustment\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] PL NETWORK adjustment (score: 1): Author: "Luca" <ik5tsw@virgilio.it>; Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:40:42 +0200; Hello All In the first place many thanks for answers at the RF CHOKE value question and my regards for this very intresting mailist. Now l would like know the correct method for the PL NETWORK adjust; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00076.html (6,756 bytes)
2. [Amps] PL network adjustment (score: 1): Author: "Luca" <ik5tsw@virgilio.it>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:52:50 +0200; Hi All I have used on some hf amplifier that I homebrewed, the Pi network and l did not have the problem with adjustment maintaining C1 and C2 fixed at the table value. I think to find the resonance; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00271.html (7,030 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] PL network adjustment (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:23:17 -0700; On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:52 AM, Luca wrote: Hi All I have used on some hf amplifier that I homebrewed, the Pi network and l did not have the problem with adjustment maintaining C1 and C2 fixed at the t; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00273.html (8,667 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]