Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PL172\s+\(8295\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] PL172 (8295) (score: 1)
Author: Chris Pedder <chris.g3vbl@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 14:11:16 +0000
For the last 37 years my Hallicrafter HT33A has been sitting on the floor in the garage with an 8295A (Ceramic) fitted. I have a pair of 'new in the box' PL172s one of whose boxes is still sealed. Pa
/archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00081.html (6,838 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] PL172 (8295) (score: 1)
Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 10:57:17 -0400
For the last 37 years my Hallicrafter HT33A has been sitting on the floor in the garage with an 8295A (Ceramic) fitted. I have a pair of 'new in the box' PL172s one of whose boxes is still sealed. P
/archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00082.html (8,072 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] PL172 (8295) (score: 1)
Author: RAY FRIESS <rayfrijr@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 15:32:17 +0000
I would not be too concerned about leakage. It happens, but very very seldom. I have tubes that are still new in box from way back in WW2 that I have used and none have ever shown air leakage. Easies
/archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00083.html (8,835 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] PL172 (8295) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 11:46:02 -0400
The original PL-172 with glass seals is NOTORIOUS for air leakage and not outgassing from the anode.....big difference. Carl I would not be too concerned about leakage. It happens, but very very seld
/archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00085.html (9,553 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] PL172 (8295) (score: 1)
Author: Glen Zook via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 16:12:59 +0000 (UTC)
The chances of a PL-172, that has been unused for years, being good (no air leakage), are somewhere between extremely slim, and none! I have a very late version Hallicrafters HT-33A (has all the circ
/archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00086.html (8,882 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] PL172 (8295) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 16:15:07 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I would bring up the power slowly with a Variac, lest it become Fourth of July a bit early. 73, Bill W6WRT ______________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00087.html (7,348 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] PL172 (8295) (score: 1)
Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 07:44:20 +0800
A 1kV megger will give you an immediate indication if there is any leakage. I use it on old tubes. I run them in a burn in jig which applys heater volts and blows air through the tube. Some of the ol
/archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00088.html (8,882 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] PL172 (8295) (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 22:22:24 -0400
I agree with Carl, I haven't seen a good PL172 (glass seal) in ages. The ceramic versions seem to hold up well. I have an HT32B 73, Roger (K8RI) Carl I would not be too concerned about leakage. It ha
/archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00091.html (10,957 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu