Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Parasitic\s+Oscillation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Parasitic\s+Oscillation\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Parasitic Oscillation (score: 1): Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 19:50:23 -0500; Will matney raised an issue we have hammered and hammered on this reflector from Day One: Parasitic Oscillations~Phenomenon or Hallucination? Will is mindful of generations of amplifier builders inco; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00051.html (8,381 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Oscillation (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 20:40:05 -0500; Hal, Marv made a very good point earlier when he mentioned about Bill Orr being associated with Eimac and said "there is no such thing as an amplifier that does not have parasitics! He made it clear; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00052.html (11,415 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Oscillation (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:23:15 -0800; On Nov 3, 2004, at 5:40 PM, Will Matney wrote: Hal, Marv made a very good point earlier when he mentioned about Bill Orr being associated with Eimac and said "there is no such thing as an amplifier t; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00055.html (9,220 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Oscillation (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 01:11:46 -0500; Rich, be plugged in. I would think so too! commercial amps aren't >>either. Plus those tubes in that amp didn't look no where new to me so the gain may have >>been lower than fresh tubes of 3-500Zs I; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00057.html (9,216 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Oscillation (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 08:02:02 +0100; Will, This is interesting. I have had flashovers in the tank circuit in my 4-1000A amp being more then 1 inch long. What you write below could explain it. 73 Jim SM2EKM -- Will Matney wrote: Rich, be; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00060.html (9,753 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Oscillation (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 06:23:03 -0800; On Nov 3, 2004, at 11:02 PM, Jan Erik Holm wrote: Will, This is interesting. I have had flashovers in the tank circuit in my 4-1000A amp being more then 1 inch long. Wow, Jim, that's got to be >26,00; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00067.html (10,535 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Oscillation (score: 1): Author: "David Lisney" <g0fvt@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:06:33 +0100; 73 de David _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00572.html (7,128 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Oscillation (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:44:51 +0100; The fundamental thing is that an oscillator (parasitic or otherwise) requires gain>1 and phase=0. There's more than one way of preventing this in an amplifier. The usual parasitic suppressor between; /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00578.html (7,927 bytes)
9. [Amps] Parasitic Oscillation (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:20:31 -0700; A series tuned circuit with a damping R Is a parasitic suppressor because it reduces the amount of anode-resonance (here, 160MHz) damped wave ringing signal fed back to the grids by the total grid-to; /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00582.html (7,287 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]