Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Parasitic\s+Resister\s+Value\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Parasitic\s+Resister\s+Value\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "R. Morris" <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:41:03 -0400; Anyone want to take a guess at the resistor value in a parasitic choke? Have an estate, Amp Supply LA-1000 for check out. Two of the parasitic choke resistors are toast. The other two are so dark as; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00254.html (6,697 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:36:56 -0400; Anything between 47-51 Ohms. Get the Ohmite OY series at Mouser, etc.....better reliability than carbon. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00255.html (8,093 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: Kees - pa7two <pa7two@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:39:22 +0000; And place the new resistors outside of the coil... (less heat) Vy 73, de Kees - PA7TWO - M5TWO DX IS and CW RULES! Twitter: @PA7TWO _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list A; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00270.html (9,571 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:16:10 -0400; There should be no heat from a proper sized coil. Carl KM1H And place the new resistors outside of the coil... (less heat) Vy 73, de Kees - PA7TWO - M5TWO DX IS and CW RULES!Twitter: @PA7TWO -- No vi; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00273.html (10,162 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:37:51 -0700; REPLY: IMO that's too much coil, no doubt that's why the resistors burned. Try just one or two turns instead. Many amps have literally a half-turn coil, in the form of a "U" connected across the resi; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00275.html (8,053 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:39:18 -0500; Measurements 59 rob k5uj _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00276.html (7,588 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:34:18 -0400; The M 59 is the only one worth owning.. Im the 2nd owner, it still has the National Radio ID label. I also have the LF head and need coils. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ A; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00280.html (7,860 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:18:50 -0700; REPLY: Expensive, clunky two-piece design, hard to find, vacuum tubes, AC line powered. Other than that, it's great. :-) The Heathkit HD-1250 at a fraction of the price is battery powered, solid stat; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00283.html (8,091 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:12:01 -0700 (PDT); It has been my experience that the tube-type GDO units work better than the solid-state units. The "dip" reading in the meter is usually greater than the solid-state units and the tube-type units se; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00284.html (9,442 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:36:59 -0500; Another possibly overlooked nice solid state dipper is the Kenwood DM-81. Newer, compact, works well and the coils are stored in a tray inside the meter. Birthday present from xyl after she saw me lu; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00285.html (9,784 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:58:18 -0400; Expensive due to a steady demand unlike the Heath and others. Seperate head makes for one handed convenience, not that goofy HD-1250 tuning. Tubes still work in case you missed that step. Most of us; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00286.html (9,988 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: RMorris <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:06:01 -0400; Have one....... Thanks for the notes. I'll play around, but following the definition of an "amplifier", fits on a table, can pick it up, this one fits in a one handed trash bag. Might make a 300 watt; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00287.html (8,160 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:04:33 -0700; REPLY: The fact that production ceased and was never restarted also speaks volumes. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lis; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00288.html (8,559 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:38:38 -0400; Only in your mind..... The company became the victim of a merger and it seems production lasted as part of the new company to at least 1959 based upon the date of the Army manual. . _________________; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00291.html (9,471 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:47:36 -0700; REPLY: That reminds me of a guy I used to work with. He had one of the very first digital multimeters and it was a piece of junk but he loved it. Shortly after he bought it the company went out of bu; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00298.html (9,237 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:28:48 +0800; Yeah. with the same sentiment, here, we say: "The best thing about xyz123 is that they don't make it anymore." 73, Alek VK6APK -- http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6ap Family Busin; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00301.html (10,170 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] Parasitic Resister Value (score: 1): Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:25:07 -0700; The Measurements 59 is a great GDO, I have one and have since 1966...and it was used then. Measurements went under but split into a few different local operations...Boonton Radio (which later became; /archives//html/Amps/2012-08/msg00302.html (10,700 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]