Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Pi\s+Net\s+Switch\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Pi\s+Net\s+Switch\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Pi Net Switch (score: 1): Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:26:41 -0700 (PDT); I am sure that this has been discussed here, but I cannot find any reference to it... Some builders say a "shorting" band switch is better that an "non-shorting" band switch. My question is why? Lee; /archives//html/Amps/2010-10/msg00236.html (6,649 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Pi Net Switch (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:46:15 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: If you have a single coil with taps for each band, the shorting type of switch will reduce or prevent the Tesla coil effect by shorting out unused sections of the coil. If yo; /archives//html/Amps/2010-10/msg00240.html (7,928 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Pi Net Switch (score: 1): Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:05:08 -0500; "non-shorting" band [] It does not matter if you only have five bands; 80 through 10 meters. It is when you add WARC and 160 meters that you need a shorting switch to prevent the Tesla effect from b; /archives//html/Amps/2010-10/msg00241.html (7,355 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]