Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+PiL\s+Current\s+ratings\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] PiL Current ratings? (score: 1)
Author: qrp73@talk21.com (qrp73@talk21.com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:41:58 GMT+01:00
When sizing the coil wire size for the L part of a a PiL, can you assume that the current is the same as in the tank circuit as a whole? Greg -- talk21 your FREE portable and private address on the n
/archives//html/Amps/2002-07/msg00200.html (6,916 bytes)

2. [Amps] PiL Current ratings? (score: 1)
Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn)
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:14:44 -0700
I believe the current would be considerably less. It is in series with the coax center conductor and the current is whatever you would see for a 50 ohm load taking the power your amp puts out. 73. Da
/archives//html/Amps/2002-07/msg00201.html (7,442 bytes)

3. [Amps] PiL Current ratings? (score: 1)
Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 08:00:16 -0700
Good pont, Dan. Tank current is approximately I-anode x tank operating Q, or typically c. 10Arms. The L section of a Pi-L carries 5.5Arms for 1500W/50-ohms. that - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805
/archives//html/Amps/2002-07/msg00202.html (7,234 bytes)

4. [Amps] PiL Current ratings? (score: 1)
Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 08:00:18 -0700
The tank circulating current would be the same as the L-section current if the tank Q was c. 6. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end
/archives//html/Amps/2002-07/msg00203.html (6,864 bytes)

5. [Amps] PiL Current ratings? (score: 1)
Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:19:56 +0100
The application of Kirchoff's Law says that, too. However, when sizing the wire, skin resistance should not be forgotten. Additionally, Rich's advice on allowing some cooling air flow is well worth f
/archives//html/Amps/2002-07/msg00204.html (7,017 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu