Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Plate\s+load\s+impedence\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Plate\s+load\s+impedence\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Plate load impedence (score: 1): Author: "Barrie Smith" <barrie@centric.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 18:06:36 -0600; Just recently there was a thread concerning the multiplication factor for calculating plate load impedence. There was one post that indicated that the multiplication factor changed relative to class; /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00048.html (6,545 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Plate load impedence (score: 1): Author: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:47:00 -0700; According to the G3SEK Pi/L design spreadsheet, the values are as follows: Class A: 1.3 Class AB: 1.5-1.7 Class B: 1.57-1.8 Class C: 2.0 -- Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ ____________; /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00049.html (7,045 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Plate load impedence (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 22:01:22 -0400; Barrie: - JimT W4ENE _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00050.html (6,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]