Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Racal\s+Dana\s+9028P\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Racal\s+Dana\s+9028P\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Racal Dana 9028P (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:11:39 -0400; Anyone have any thoughts about how good or bad a Racal Dana 9028P signal generator is? I know it will go from audio to about 520 MHz, AM, FM, CW, etc. Digital freq counter with coarse and fine tuning; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00628.html (6,676 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Racal Dana 9028P (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:53:22 +0100; Is it 9028 or 9082? I have a couple of 9081/9082 - used as door stops mainly. They're ok as sources for single tone amplifer testing and for testing commercial FM radio kit, otherwise they're awful.; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00635.html (6,720 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Racal Dana 9028P (score: 1): Author: "Roger Glover" <r.glover@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:16:07 +0100; Will, If you mean a 9082, it's a fair but cheap synthesiser. I've got one and use it fairly often. Perhaps it's not what you're thinking of as the min freq on this is 1.5MHz. To me, it's biggest draw; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00644.html (8,079 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Racal Dana 9028P (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 02:46:20 +0100 (CET); One of that series ( and I can't remember which) was fully synthesised and very quiet. Plus very heavy and not too small. 73 Peter W6/G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailin; /archives//html/Amps/2005-10/msg00734.html (7,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]