Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+COLLINS\s+Engineering\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re: COLLINS Engineering (score: 1)
Author: RFlabnotes at aol.com (RFlabnotes@aol.com)
Date: Sun Mar 23 12:03:17 2003
Ian: I agree with you 110% about Collins/Rockwell technology. That particularl era/group of engineers really set the benchmarks. If you read through any of their publications (of which there are, sad
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00792.html (7,830 bytes)

2. [Amps] Re: COLLINS Engineering (score: 1)
Author: G3SEK at ifwtech.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Sun Mar 23 12:42:25 2003
Cue Peter Chadwick... (if he's not travelling again) -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00793.html (8,401 bytes)

3. [Amps] Re: COLLINS Engineering (score: 1)
Author: 2 at vc.net (2)
Date: Sun Mar 23 13:02:20 2003
** unless you are the contractor for the Osprey project. As i recall, there was an Army radar-controlled anti-aircraft gun that sucked up a couple of $Gigadollars before taxpayers found out the Russ
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00794.html (8,197 bytes)

4. [Amps] Re: COLLINS Engineering (score: 1)
Author: DF3KV at aol.com (DF3KV@aol.com)
Date: Sun Mar 23 14:29:20 2003
In my opinion that was Racal 73 Peter
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00798.html (6,966 bytes)

5. [Amps] Re: COLLINS Engineering (score: 1)
Author: peter.chadwick at Zarlink.Com (peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com)
Date: Mon Mar 24 04:59:36 2003
of Take your pick from Marconi, Racal, Redifon, Plessey (only up to about 1kW at HF), STC. Racal and Marconi and STC were big in the point to point stuff. Marconi were for a long time the naval suppl
/archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00806.html (7,658 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu