Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+Transformer\s+in\s+GLA\s+1000\s+B\s+\:\s+OK\s+for\s+2xGI\s+7\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\:\s+Transformer\s+in\s+GLA\s+1000\s+B\s+\:\s+OK\s+for\s+2xGI\s+7\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re: Transformer in GLA 1000 B : OK for 2xGI 7 ? (score: 1): Author: craxd <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:36:48 -0400; David, You can "kind of" go by those charts. Really, the core has to be sized by several factors more than the weight. It's according to what type of circuit they'll go in, the frequency, duty cycle,; /archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00061.html (8,019 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Re: Transformer in GLA 1000 B : OK for 2xGI 7 ? (score: 1): Author: craxd <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:12:40 -0400; David, Actually they have that transformer de-rated some by calling it a 1150 VA. It actually is about 1495 watts or VA for single phase. This leads me to believe they probably wound this for CCS dut; /archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00069.html (10,341 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]